Paper Kings War : How Hearst Trashed Cannabis to Save his Timber Empire - Ganjah History -

TL;DR ? Simple Version !
A media mongul lost land in Mexico round 1917 that was for his timbermills and a fear of cheap alternative hemp paper led to the 1937 Tax Act

If you’ve ever wondered why a plant used for thousands of years suddenly became “The Devil’s Weed,” look no further than the 1910s and a man named William Randolph Hearst.

1. The Grudge: Pancho Villa vs. The 800,000 Acres

In 1917, Pancho Villa wasn’t just a revolutionary; he was Hearst’s worst nightmare. Villa’s army reclaimed massive tracts of land, including a staggering 800,000 acres of timberland in Mexico owned by Hearst.

Hearst—the ultimate “spoiled rich kid” with a media empire—couldn’t fight Villa with a rifle, so he used the inkwell. He needed a way to demonize the Mexican Revolution and protect his remaining American assets.

2. The Rebrand: From “Cannabis” to “Marijuana”

Up until this point, Americans knew the plant as Cannabis (found in pharmacies) or Hemp (the backbone of the textile industry). To create fear, Hearst used Yellow Journalism to push a “foreign” threat. He swapped the scientific name for the Spanish slang “Marijuana” to make it sound “un-American.”

3. The Headlines of Hate

Hearst’s papers began running sensationalized, often completely fabricated stories. While exact historical archives vary, the sentiment in his publications like the New York Journal echoed these themes:

“Washe-out ‘Marijuana’ fiends of the Mexican Army lose all sense of restraint, committing atrocities against the civilized world!”

“The marijuana-smoking ‘Locoweed’ addicts are a menace to the industrial progress of the American worker!”

Hearst had linked the plant to “insanity” and violent crime, specifically targeting Mexican immigrants to fuel a moral panic.

4. The Industrial Hit Job

The real motive? The bottom line. Hearst had invested most of his fortune in wood-pulp paper mills. At the same time, new technology (like the decorticator) was making hemp paper cheaper and more durable than wood paper. If hemp took off, Hearst’s timber empire would collapse.

He found a perfect ally in Harry Anslinger, the head of the newly formed Federal Bureau of Narcotics. Together, they pushed the narrative that led to the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937.

5. The Ultimate “Gotcha”: The Tax Trap

The 1937 Act was a bureaucratic masterpiece of corruption. To grow hemp legally, you had to pay a tax and get a stamp from the Treasury. However:

  1. To get the stamp, you had to have the hemp.
  2. If you had the hemp without the stamp, you were a criminal.
  3. The office to pay the tax was often monitored by the precursor to the DEA.

It was a legal “Catch-22” designed to ensure no one could ever grow it legally again.

So now that you know does Trump really seem like that bad of a guy :sweat_smile:

4 Likes

I hate Trump for other reasons as an army vet. This was an interesting read though. I say fuck it, it’s illegal in my state to grow unless it’s a commercial grow but I defy. It’s my duty to defy unlawful laws as a citizen. We shouldn’t cave to their wants and desires. The ban they are putting on seeds won’t even be a big deal, we had access to seeds 30 years ago when they were illegal so I’m not worried about Trump. He’s the reason I became a libertarian though. So I thank him for that, I now know that’s what I should have been voting this whole time.

5 Likes

Yeah, the :tangerine::poop::clown_face: is worse and not even close. Hearst may have been a SOB, but he pales compared to Mango Mussolini.

4 Likes

Mango mussolini, lmao that’s amazing

2 Likes

Yea, I feel ya.
Laws are more for court and judicial system.
When we first started confusing the laws of God and the laws of the Universe with political nonsense I think is about the same time we started our obsession with sugar’

3 Likes

I looked into da Section 781 thing and its pretty straightforward.

Taxes and regulation, standards and practices NEED to be set forth.

With tabacoo, seeds are provided by an American company, and only the strains approved can be sold by licensed merchants.

With Cannabis proving to be a viable market bigger companies are going to step in and make it harder for smaller ma’ and pa’ owners to grow and sell.

Southpark did explain this in the Tegerdy series of tha show :slight_smile:

Right now we are looking at certified Seeds and certified growers with this legal framework’

Kinda thinkin about it - out here in Romania I tried different seeds providers and de one that had the best logistics ( it didnt take a month for da seeds to get here ) has really bad seeds.
I mean I just got a Royal Queen 3 pack and the thing dat popped outta da ground 2 weeks ago is already running circles around da 12 week old seeds mafia one.

Thats what I mean by good regulation.

3 Likes

This was actually a cool read, good job man!

4 Likes

Very nicely done and worded. Did you get your info from The Emperor Wears No Clothes by Jack Herer? I was actually lucky enough to meet him way back in the early 90’s. He came to the U of Notre Dame to give a talk on hemp. My friends and I were very active in the legalization movement and we hooked up with his crew. I got to smoke with Jack! He was one of the coolest people I’ve ever met. He was so incredibly intelligent, knowledgeable and well spoken. He put a new face on the movement. I used to have an autographed copy of his book but unfortuneately someone stole it :smiling_face_with_sunglasses::sign_of_the_horns::green_heart:

5 Likes

This was during and just after the era of Prohibition. I imagine the populace was open to regulating other “dangerous” substances.

I’ve been a Libertarian for several decades, I’ve never voted for Trump. I cannot stand his public persona, a crass, self-absorbed addict of hyperbole, but I do like what he did in his first term and his intent in the second (his bull in a china shop approach not so much). And of course I like his attempt to reclassify cannabis as schedule III.

2 Likes

Dat book iz on my list of books to add to my library.
I first herd da story from Danielle Simone Brand in Weed Mom, then researched witt google.

Soooo, people want high tetrahydrocannabinoid plants because thc is psychoactive :sweat_smile: at da same time people want that same THC to be not categorized as a highly psychoactive substance.

Its like saying magic mushrooms do not cause hallucinations’

I am happy to see such rad people around here’

1 Like

There will always be a Heel, an Eminem, an Fidel Castro, an VinceMcman… Lets not raise and praise this one man to that level of infamy.

As some band once sang -± I dont care what you say as long as its about me -±